您好，Isamit！欢迎加入维基百科！
感謝您對維基百科的興趣與貢獻，希望您會喜歡這裡。除了歡迎辭以外，也請您了解以下重要文章：
 |
 |
 |
 If you have any questions about the Chinese Wikipedia, please leave a message here. Thank you for visiting!
| ||
- 閱讀新手应该注意的七种常见错误、理解維基百科的立場與常見注意事項。
- 有任何编辑上的问题？请试试IRC即时讨论。也可在下面加入「{{Helpme}}」，其他维基人见到后就会来提供帮助。
- 不知道有甚麼可写？条目请求、最多语言版本的待撰条目、缺少的传统百科全书条目和首页的缺失条目中列出了许多维基百科目前还没有的条目，欢迎您来撰寫！
- 想創建條目？到條目創建請求提交你的條目，維基人很樂意幫助。
- 希望您能享受共同编写百科的樂趣，成为一名充實的维基百科人。
我是欢迎您的维基人：用戶 (留言) 2010年7月27日 (二) 13:33 (UTC)
Copyvio
请解释您在翔、石川太陽、奈義条目中的编辑动作。日文维基删除这些条目并不意味着侵犯版权。感谢配合。
- Please explain your edits on these articles: 翔, 石川太陽 and 奈義. Articles being deleted by Japanese Wikipedia is not a valid reason for copy violation. Thank you for your cooperation.--Kuailong™ 2013年1月25日 (五) 04:46 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contact on this matter. Your help will be welcomed because I know a few rule on Chinese Wikipedia. I couldn't read Wikipedia:翻译守则 because it was written in Chinese, but in the same rule in Japanese Wikipedia ja:WP:TRANS, translators have to write an original source (Article name, Date and Revision, for example) at Summary even though it's in other language versions.
- At first, I pasted 模板:Notability, because I thought the three articles don't have Notability. But Chinese Wikipedians showed their ideas that the articles have Notability, even though ja:石川太陽 was deleted by lack of Notability. About Notability, I don't have any opinion any more. I would like to pay attention to Chinese Wikipedians' dicision.
- However, I believe the articles still have problem about copyright violation. I suppose the three articles are translation from Japanese Wikipedia. I viewed all the histories of 翔, 奈義 and 石川太陽, but the first writer didn't write any source on Summary. How do Chinese Wikipedia deal on this matter? Is not copyright violation? Please let me know your idea. Thank you. --Isamit（留言） 2013年1月25日 (五) 05:37 (UTC)
關注度過期
閣下曾掛關注度模板之條目木村和輝已到限期，如閣下認為該條目現時尚未合乎關注度標準，可作提刪。--Nivekin※請留言 2013年2月23日 (六) 06:38 (UTC)