您好，Isamit！歡迎加入維基百科！
感謝您對維基百科的興趣與貢獻，希望您會喜歡這裏。除了歡迎辭以外，也請您了解以下重要文章：
 |
 |
 |
 If you have any questions about the Chinese Wikipedia, please leave a message here. Thank you for visiting!
| ||
- 閱讀新手應該注意的七種常見錯誤、理解維基百科的立場與常見注意事項。
- 有任何編輯上的問題？請試試IRC即時討論。也可在下面加入「{{Helpme}}」，其他維基人見到後就會來提供幫助。
- 不知道有甚麼可寫？條目請求、最多語言版本的待撰條目、缺少的傳統百科全書條目和首頁的缺失條目中列出了許多維基百科目前還沒有的條目，歡迎您來撰寫！
- 想創建條目？到條目創建請求提交你的條目，維基人很樂意幫助。
- 希望您能享受共同編寫百科的樂趣，成為一名充實的維基百科人。
我是歡迎您的維基人：用戶 (留言) 2010年7月27日 (二) 13:33 (UTC)
Copyvio
請解釋您在翔、石川太陽、奈義條目中的編輯動作。日文維基刪除這些條目並不意味着侵犯版權。感謝配合。
- Please explain your edits on these articles: 翔, 石川太陽 and 奈義. Articles being deleted by Japanese Wikipedia is not a valid reason for copy violation. Thank you for your cooperation.--Kuailong™ 2013年1月25日 (五) 04:46 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contact on this matter. Your help will be welcomed because I know a few rule on Chinese Wikipedia. I couldn't read Wikipedia:翻譯守則 because it was written in Chinese, but in the same rule in Japanese Wikipedia ja:WP:TRANS, translators have to write an original source (Article name, Date and Revision, for example) at Summary even though it's in other language versions.
- At first, I pasted 模板:Notability, because I thought the three articles don't have Notability. But Chinese Wikipedians showed their ideas that the articles have Notability, even though ja:石川太陽 was deleted by lack of Notability. About Notability, I don't have any opinion any more. I would like to pay attention to Chinese Wikipedians' dicision.
- However, I believe the articles still have problem about copyright violation. I suppose the three articles are translation from Japanese Wikipedia. I viewed all the histories of 翔, 奈義 and 石川太陽, but the first writer didn't write any source on Summary. How do Chinese Wikipedia deal on this matter? Is not copyright violation? Please let me know your idea. Thank you. --Isamit（留言） 2013年1月25日 (五) 05:37 (UTC)
關注度過期
閣下曾掛關注度模板之條目木村和輝已到限期，如閣下認為該條目現時尚未合乎關注度標準，可作提刪。--Nivekin※請留言 2013年2月23日 (六) 06:38 (UTC)